Consumer Report’s on iPhone 4′s Antenna Issue

Consumer Reports has recently just released a report which somehow “proved” that the iPhone 4 does have a signal drop issue when a person hold the phone or touch the phone at the particular (bottom left) area.

But an EMC engineer disagree with the report, saying that CR (short for Consumer Reports) didn’t used a controlled environment for the tests, thus, the results are not to be taken as valid.

While I may not be an EMC, EME, RF or an antenna engineer, I do know my way around the lab, the equipments and RF testing. Working right next to all 3 EME, EMC and RF labs does give me enough experience to comment on this.

First of all, controlled tests are always good to reproduce accurate and repeatable results to measure the performance of the device. This is important as to show that the device complies with regulations and does not interfere with other signals. For example, SAR tests performed by EME labs measures the rate at which energy is absorbed by the body when exposed to a radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field. Too much, and it’s considered dangerous for humans. EMC tests on the other hand, will test the radiation pattern and power of the device in a controlled room where RF noise are shielded and reflections absorbed. Humans aren’t supposed to be inside and even the attached measuring instruments outside the room are shielded.

The problem with all these very expensive, accurate and exhaustive testing is, although they try to reproduce real world issues as much as possible, it’s still a controlled test up to a certain degree of acceptance. They can never be able to capture a full range of problems which can happen in real world environment. There are too many things which can happen outside the lab and there are always reasons why all these electronic devices have updated hardware revisions.

New tests are always developed to reproduce those reported issues to try to determine the cause and action needed. If the problem is hard to reproduced in the controlled environment, then it’s further escalated to R&D to capture the problem on the board level.

What Apple is doing on the other hand, is trying to blame others for their problem. Are Apple’s engineers really working on a fix is anyone’s guess but everyone should always take those Consumer reports with a pinch of salt. It’s not a controlled test. But every “Professionals” should also never ignore the public opinion even when the problem is not done through controlled environment. A problem is still a problem and an engineer’s job is to provide solutions to a problem. Not to provide excuses!

2 thoughts on “Consumer Report’s on iPhone 4′s Antenna Issue

  1. I do not know about EME, EMC or ABC and DEF but showing that the problem exist on the other phone will make your competitors hates you. So you can forget your future partnership with them.
    Look at Google/Apple and Nokia/Apple relation after the sued case. May be someday, Google may only show result about bad apple production rating. I was hoping google.com is showing “Apple product are not allow to search on google page”.

    They actually provided a solution to the antenna issue. FREE CASE…. lol. It took me few minutes before i can stop laughing.
    Apple has arrogant attitude and will never admit their mistake even it has been proven.
    Give out free case means they indirectly admitted there is problem with the antenna but still trying to save their a$$.

    They even say there are less people reporting about the antenna issue compare to 3G/3GS. Does that means there is already antenna problem in previous iphone ? and they did not fix it.
    Lower number of people reporting about the issue BECAUSE it is all over the internet and even news paper. Why you bother to call and complain about a problem that they try not to admit. Unless you have too much time and credit to spend on your mobile phone. LOL again.

    Apple, it is time to wake up and fix your mistake. Your customer will be much happier than what you trying to do now to cover it.

  2. The fact that every company know that if the antenna can be affected by human touch, then they placed it where people can not touch it. That’s an engineering solution to a problem.

    Apple on the other hand, is too stupid to admit that they sacrificed feature to gain looks.

    Luckily Apple is not designing power grid technology, of they’ll expose a live wire, inviting people to touch it and tell people you’ll die also if you touch a traditional 3 pin plug, but ours has less report. -_-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>